MAYORmessages

October 18, 2017

Midway City Council Goes Live

by Colleen Bonner


Midway City Council Chambers prior to a regularly scheduled council 
meeting held Thursday, October 11, 6:00 pm. This is the first frame from 
the video found on the facebook page titled, Midway City. 
(c) 2017, by Jeff Kohler, Marketing Video Club
Transparency in city government took an upturn last week in Midway City thanks to two citizens with an idea and the time to make it happen. Lauri Neal brought Jeff Kohler to the city office on Wednesday afternoon, October 11, at about two o’clock to discuss their thoughts with me.

Lauri Neal introduced Jeff Kohler, a professional videographer, and they presented their plan to use videography to live stream City Council meetings on Midway City’s facebook page. I had never heard of live streaming before. I asked Kohler if it would be possible to be ready in just a few hours and he assured me it was.

Intrigued by the concept I immediately felt it was the perfect plan for right now. I asked how it worked and before long we were discussing the possibility of live streaming that evening’s City Council meeting. Kohler said he thought there would be time to set up before the meeting would begin at 6:00 o’clock. He quickly began a test run to demonstrate how the process worked.

My main reason for pursuing this vision is best described in a question, how can you get more transparent than live broadcasting of city meetings? Then I thought of how many more people could be aware and involved in city government by being able to watch the meetings in the convenience of their own homes at a time of their own choosing. With these thoughts in mind I began calling each council member to see if they were interested. Each one agreed to give it a try that evening, then evaluate for the future. So we were off and running, it was a busy afternoon but the first live stream meeting went forward without any glitches and a received a welcome reception.

Still available, the video can be found on our facebook page, titled Midway City.   
https://www.facebook.com/MidwayCity1891/videos/1471606149621692/

By Thursday morning the video had over 1000 hits. Kohler said that some of those could be repeats; people who listened for awhile, left the feed and then joined in again later. Even given the possible repeats we feel this number shows much public interest. By Monday morning there were over 1200 hits. In addition there were several dozen positive comments.

Councilman Ken Van Wagoner was out of town and excused from the meeting, but was able to watch the meeting because of the live feed. This was his comment, “I think this is a wonderful idea. This way the public is better informed. I think this is great for those of us that can’t make the meeting.”

Other comments included my opponents in the current election. Celeste Johnson, current mayoral candidate, said, “Thank you for the live feed.” Pat Vaughn, former mayoral candidate, said, “Congratulations Mayor and City Council. You made a great decision, considerate of citizen input and concerns. This will be the single most important new business to add to our vibrancy as a city and image as a destination. Thank You!”

The meeting was recorded with one camera set up in the southeast corner of the council chambers in order to capture all council members seated along the west wall and city staff seated along the north wall. For each meeting the city staff, under the direction of Michael Henke, city planner, prepares a power point with important information on each agenda item which is cast on the south wall. The presentation was out of camera range.

Steven Sheranian had a suggestion for improvement on the video feed in the comments. He asked “Is it possible to show the slides?” Lauri Neal responded, “This is a test run. Adjustments will be made in the future.”

Toward the end of the video Kohler posted, “Glad we have so many people watching. My company Marketing Videos Club helped make this happen.”

At the conclusion of the video Neal posted this comment, “The credit goes to Mayor Bonner and the City Council for having the vision of giving more people an opportunity to see what actually takes place in planning Midways future. And thanks for the expertise of Jeff Kohler of Marketing Videos Club for sharing this concept. For those who watched tonight you can still post your feedback. It would be greatly appreciated to hear what you thought of this new and innovative format. Thank you for watching!”

I am excited to live in this time where we have the ability to provide a way for citizens to attend city meetings remotely. We hope to provide this service again going forward. I want to personally thank Lauri Neal and Jeff Kohler of Marketing Video Club for sharing their idea and for their willingness to make this happen. I believe citizen participation is valuable to our city and live streaming our meetings will give more citizens the opportunity to become informed. As citizens watch the city at work questions may arise. Please feel free to call or email questions to any city council or staff member. Our contact information is on the city website: Mayor and city council http://www.midwaycityut.org/Mayor-and-City-Council  City staff http://www.midwaycityut.org/Contact-Us


 September 27, 2017

Open Space is Valuable and Essential to our Community.

by Colleen Bonner

Midway City has a track record of finding ways to preserve open space. There are already ordinances in Midway City’s code that require various types of open space to the community through the development process. Further, more ordinances that relate to open space as outlined in Midway’s general plan will be implemented during Midway’s current moratorium.

The Midway City Council strongly supports voters being given the opportunity to decide whether or not they want to bond for open space. Every council member, whether for or against bonding for open space, has made a statement to that effect in recent city council meetings. For several very good reasons the council felt the bonding process was being rushed. However, it is highly likely voters will see a bond referendum for open space on the general election ballot in 2018 either on the county level, the city level, or both. Outlined below are the most significant reasons the council voted against placing a bond referendum on the 2017 general election ballot.

Reason One 
There is not currently a specific definition of open space. Pure Midway and other concerned citizens held two meetings on open space and presented a list of potential items that could be considered open space to the city council. The council appreciates the work done by this group and intends to give this list to our Open Space Committee once formed. The first task assigned to the committee will be to define open space through a public legislative process with input from all Midway citizens in public hearings and town meetings. The citizen generated list will be the committees starting point. Seventeen applications for the Open Space committee have been received. The council passed a resolution forming the committee at our regular meeting held on Wednesday, September 13. The council will select seven members for the committee from this pool of candidates.

Randy Larson, bond counsel, explained two options for defining open space in our special meeting held Thursday, August 18. One option was to leave the definition general which would allow the counsel latitude to spend the bond money on any type of open space they wanted, from farm land to an outdoor amphitheater. The other option was to define specifically what type of open space the bond money could be used for so voters would know what kind of open space they would be purchasing.

Corbin Gordon, city attorney, would have been assigned the task of writing a Voter Information pamphlet. Gordon asked the city council to come up with the definition of open space that night so he could describe to the voters exactly what they would be paying for if the bond passed. Gordon told the council he would have to immediately begin writing the Voter information pamphlet to meet the state deadline.

The council discussed whether to keep the definition general or specific. In the end the council decided voters would be more likely to support a bond with a specific description of what their dollars would buy rather than leaving it open ended. Also the council knew the legislative process for coming up with a specific definition with public input from all Midway citizens would require time to form the open space committee and time for the committee and the city council to hold public hearings.

The council feels it is important to have the open space definition solidified so that future city councils know exactly what the desire of Midway citizens was if and when they approve the bond. Larsen told the council that voter approved bond money can be used any time within ten years of voter authorization, and it can also be spent in increments according to state code. For example, if $10 million were approved the council could spend $2 million for one project in one year, $5 million on another project a few years later, and still have another $3 million for a future project. For this reason the current council feels responsible to future city councils years down the road who will make the decisions about spending the bond funds.

Reason Two
Mid August when the bond decision was before us the council was already two months into its current six month moratorium which began June 14 and will end December 13. The code text amendments the city is working on during this moratorium are based on new ideas included in the general plan after last year’s state mandated five year review. Those ideas were originally proposed by the same people who were also asking for a bond referendum in 2017, Pure Midway and a group of concerned citizens. Essentially they first asked us to slow down and look at our codes and update them to implement new ways to create open space and less density through our ordinances. Then while we were in the middle of addressing those issues they were now asking us to hurry up and get the bond referendum on the 2017 ballot.

From the beginning of the moratorium the council knew we would be hard pressed to pass all the proposed changes before the moratorium ends. The timeline for placing the bond referendum on this year’s general election ballot would have taken approximately six weeks out of crucial moratorium time. Even if others volunteered to help with the preparations, ultimately the responsibility to meet state requirements belongs to the city council and staff. City staff, the lawyer, the planner, the engineer, and the recorder, would all be involved in writing the bond language and the Voter Information pamphlet, and soliciting public input and holding public hearings, all important things that city employees are required to complete per state code. The council strongly feels the city staff needs to stay focused on the purpose of the moratorium so when it ends and developers begin making applications to the city again, the ordinances will reflect the changes made in last year’s general plan revision.

Reason Three 
As elected officials it is our responsibility to give the best information possible to all Midway citizens. We do not feel we had the time to put together the best information to give the public. While the council appreciates what Pure Midway and other concerned citizens have accomplished and presented to the city, this same group was pushing the council to make a hasty decision. We did not discredit the time and effort put into gathering information through two meetings on open space, along with a survey conducted and the hundreds of signatures collected. We appreciate the good start these loyal citizens have given toward open space preservation through bonding.

Ultimately we just did not feel the six to eight weeks we had to prepare the bond referendum for this year’s ballot was enough to get the job done right. We did not feel we had all the information needed for all Midway citizens to make an educated decision on a long term financial commitment that would affect every Midway property owner for twenty years.

Reason Four 
As a council we feel it is important to work with other local government agencies. Wasatch County is currently in the process of creating an Inter-local Open Space Board. They have wisely chosen to take at least a year to prepare for a bond referendum to preserve open space between Heber City and Midway City, potentially in the north fields. Their first step is forming the Open Space Board.

As a council we agree with the county’s approach and, like them, we want to start with our own open space committee and take the time to get the bond proposal right. The county has invited both Heber City and Midway City to participate in their open space plans by providing one board member to represent each city and by pooling together some of each city’s bonding potential with Wasatch County’s bonding potential to get a larger bond. Wasatch County is considering a request made by Midway City to assign a percentage of the county bond to be spent in Midway.

In summary, we believe open space bonding should and will go before the voters. Our Open Space Committee will soon be working on an open space definition for bonding. The remaining three months of our current moratorium will be focused on open space and density code text amendment changes. We have the next year to put together the best information on open space bonding. Then we can decide what form bonding should take, on a county level, a city level, or on both levels. Open space decisions are crucial to our community and deserve taking the time to do it right.


CITIZEN INQUIRY EMAIL: If you have any questions please email me at my new citizen inquiry address: mayorcolleenbonner@gmail.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please follow the same guidelines from our facebook group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/midwayutah/

THIS BLOG IS FOR INFORMATIVE PURPOSES. Political commentary with the intent to inform is welcome. Positive sharing of community events is highly encouraged. Please keep comments positive. Please remember the art of civility in your communication. Agree to disagree if necessary to keep group exchanges respectful. No name calling, arguing, or trolling allowed.