One for Midway City, One for Wasatch County
by Robin M Johnson
Thirty years of talk about open space in Wasatch County has
led to over 14,000 acres of land set aside as open space within developments
for the purpose of preserving a rural feeling in Heber Valley. However, much of
that open space is hidden within developments, or is on the mountainsides. Some
developments have opted to dedicate their open space land to the city for
parks, owned and maintained by the city. The first two PUD’s to choose this
path in Midway were The Hamlet and The Valais.
These efforts have not necessarily produced the type of open
space many are seeking. This article will address both the city and county efforts
to retain a rural look and atmosphere by preserving farmland, the possibility
of the city and county each placing bond referendums before voters, and the
efforts of citizens organizing in Midway to get a bond on the Midway ballot
possibly this fall. In fact, Pure Midway is making a presentation to the city
council tomorrow night, Wednesday, August 9, requesting the city place a bond
referendum on the ballot in the November General Election.
Steve Farrell and Mark Nelson, Wasatch county council members,
made a presentation to the Midway City Council on Wednesday, July 27, at their
regular meeting. Farrell talked about the county’s plan to create the Wasatch
Open Lands Board (WOLB) through an Inter-local Agreement and asked the council
if they would be interested in participating on the county level.
Ken Van Wagoner, city council member, said, “I think we’d be
foolish not to participate. I think our whole goal for, not only Midway, but
county wide, is more open space. More farms, more preservation.”
Farrell said, “I don’t think we need more open space, we
need more quality open space. In the last thirty years we have about 14,000
acres, through development agreements, of open space which on the hillside
nobody really gets a chance to see.”
Van Wagoner agreed, “Yeah, that isn’t what we’re after.”
Colleen Bonner, mayor, said, “More of farm preservation, conservation
type stuff. But I think it’s important that Midway City have a committee that
identifies those areas in our general region, we’re not even talking
particularly city limits.” Bonner said Midway’s general region would be anything west
of the Provo River. The land surrounding Midway on this side of the river that
is county land “affects our city boundaries”.
As part of the general plan Midway City has a Future
Annexation map, a declaration of intent to annex, which is required by the
state of Utah for every city in the state. Midway City boundaries do not extend
to the Provo River on its eastern boundary yet, nor to the Wasatch Mountain
State Park on the west, however Midway has declared intent to annex to those
borders as property owners make requests to the city. Bonner said maybe some of
the area Midway might want to preserve as farm land “would still be county land”.
The discussion above between the city and county council
leaders is an example of the change in direction talk of open space has taken
in recent years. Leaders in Heber Valley are hearing what the majority of
residents are asking for when they say open space. The community survey taken
last year as Midway updated the general plan supports the idea of preserving
not just the rural feel but the actual rural farming lifestyle, pastures and
hayfields.
Van Wagoner said it best, “More of the farm preservation
aspect; where we see cows. We want to see cows.”
In response to survey results last year Midway passed a new land use ordinance this spring called the Rural Farm
Preservation Ordinance. Several developers have already made application to the
city using the new law. Developments brought in under this ordinance require five
acres of farm land without a house, six acres with a house.
During the county presentation Farrell explained the county’s rationale for the WOLB board.
He said, “The County has been working on this and we are looking at going out
and seeing what we can do to preserve some of the open land, the farm land. We
thought if we went out county wide we’d have a better chance and a better
effort.” In particular he described Heber City, Midway City, and Wasatch County joining their bonding ability for greater purchasing power.
Farrell said the county proposes there should be no
development between Midway and Heber City. The WOLB board was created to preserve farm fields between the two cities in several ways. First, to do the research for ways to fund farm
land preservation, second, to help promote the
preservation effort and third, to educate the voters on bonding and other potential funding methods the board identifies to protect the farm fields.
Farrell said, “I think as a combined effort we can probably
go out for a pretty sizable bond and do some good. Probably there’d be no bond
for 2017, but probably 2018. I don’t think there’s ample time to do it justice”
for this year.
Bonner said, “But there are other resources out there, too,
that you talked about two weeks ago and so I think part of the education is
what other resources are available because a bond isn’t always the top thing we
have to go after.”
Farrell said, “Yes, get the committee up and running so they
can do that kind of research and make recommendations.”
Both Farrell and Nelson met with Bonner and the city
planner, Michael Henke, in the afternoon prior to the council’s regular meeting. Farrell said
they were discussing ways to make the idea of Midway participating in the
county wide open space plan more amenable. One idea was particularly attractive to
the group and Farrell presented it to the city council.
“If a community wanted to have their own open space
committee,” Farrell said, “and they work under the same criteria as the county,
then there might be a way we could allocate a percentage of the bonds to the
city to help with this. If they had a project that met the criteria so all the
money wouldn’t be spent in the north fields or someplace else. Now that’s
something we will have to take back (to the county council), but that’s a good
suggestion.”
Photo Taken: Fall 2013 (c) Robin Johnson, 2013, 2017 |
If Midway participates on the county level they would select
one person as a representative of Midway to serve on the seven member WOLB board.
In addition there would be one representative from Heber City, one from the Heber
Valley Chamber of Commerce Tourism, two from Wasatch County, and two at large.
Each body would select their own representatives. The Wasatch County Council
would select the two at large members from a pool of candidates who each fill
out an application for the position.
Bonner asked, “Are we interested in being a part of that
group as well, because I think there’s some real value to farm preservation of
county land, as well as farm preservation in Midway City. I think we need to
kind of look at all of it.”
Karl Dodge, council member, asked if the county resolution
before the city council was in its final form. When he learned it was a draft
resolution he asked if city council would see the final resolution. Ferrell
said the county would return with a final resolution for Midway’s approval.
Bonner said according to the draft resolution the county would
like to have Midway pick their board representative by the first of October. The
council agreed and decided to wait until the county returns with the final
resolution.
The next item on the council agenda was discussion on forming
an Open Space committee for Midway. Two weeks previous the council decided to
postpone their decision of whether Midway should have an Open Space committee of its own until after hearing the county presentation to create
the WOLB board in order to best determine what course the city
should take.
During the county presentation Van Wagoner asked, “Would
Midway have their own open space board and they would go through and ... look at the areas that they would like to see as open space, and then that
would be taken, for example, to the county’s board which would include a (Midway)
representative?”
Farrell confirmed, “It could work that way.” He suggested
having the committee work out their goals, then give that information to the
Midway representative who would then take the information to the county board. “That
would be your purgative,” Farrell concluded.
After hearing the county’s proposal the council went ahead
with their decision to form an Open Space committee. Henke was directed to
prepare an application and have it available online and for pick up at the city
offices by Monday, July 31. For application click here: http://www.midwaycityut.org/
The city is looking for seven citizen members and
will assign two non-voting council members to the committee, the same format
used by the city to create the newly formed Midway Trails and Parks Committee
(MTPC). The application will also be similar to the one recently filled out by
candidates who applied for MTPC.
Finally, Pure Midway and other citizens for smart growth and
open space preservation held two community meetings on Open Space in July. They
have asked to be on tomorrow night’s council agenda to present information on growth
management, rural preservation, and open space. Pure Midway hopes to meet the
mid August deadline for a bond referendum on this fall’s General Election
ballot.
According to a post on Pure Midway’s facebook page, “Pure Midway believes a bond would be a
critical toolbox item to help Midway manage growth. We support a bond if the
citizens want that, and we believe that the citizens definitely deserve a
chance to vote on it.”
Midway City has scheduled a 45 minute public hearing following
Pure Midway’s presentation for citizen comment. According to Pure Midway the city will not vote on
bonding tomorrow night. They will decide tomorrow night whether or not to hold a special
meeting where a possible vote could happen because the city is required by state code to hold two meetings on the bond before the council votes on the matter.
Special Note: Here is a link to Pure Midway’s blog with an article on the Pro’s and Con’s of Bonding for Open Space: https://puremidway.org/bondqanda/
Special Note: Here is a link to Pure Midway’s blog with an article on the Pro’s and Con’s of Bonding for Open Space: https://puremidway.org/bondqanda/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please follow the same guidelines from our facebook group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/midwayutah/
THIS BLOG IS FOR INFORMATIVE PURPOSES. Political commentary with the intent to inform is welcome. Positive sharing of community events is highly encouraged. Please keep comments positive. Please remember the art of civility in your communication. Agree to disagree if necessary to keep group exchanges respectful. No name calling, arguing, or trolling allowed.