Center Street and Main Street
by Robin M Johnson
Work on the first
traffic light for Midway began Monday morning, Utah Department of
Transportation (UDOT) workers began spraying paint to mark the area at Center
Street and Main Street. Wes Johnson, city engineer, told the city council at
their work meeting held last Wednesday, July 12, to expect that UDOT would
begin their project soon.
Johnson said, "I
had a meeting with UDOT yesterday (July 11) concerning the Center Street and
Main Street light. I told them that the completion date for the project had to
be two weeks before Swiss Days." Johnson wanted the council to know he had
authorized the project to begin so they would not be surprised when the work
commenced.
In an interview Johnson said he did not know exactly when the work would begin but he had specifically asked UDOT that no work be done in the two weeks prior to Swiss Days, this was in order to avoid added congestion on Main Street during preparations for the annual festival and the festival itself. At the same time he also asked UDOT to move forward as quickly as they could because there is no way the completion date on the project can be pushed back. Johnson was very pleased at UDOT's quick response when the work began on Monday.
Johnson said he has been
meeting with UDOT regularly for about six to nine months on plans for two lights coming to Midway. He said, "UDOT has been very willing to work with Midway, they are very good at notifying local entities about work that is happening in their community in the coming year, and even the next year. The only thing they maybe could have done is call and say, Wes, we're starting work on Monday."
To be fair Johnson added that typically the state doesn't call with the exact date work will start. "If we owe them anything, we owe UDOT our thanks for being willing to come quickly and work around Swiss Days." They don't have to do that.
Residents, however, have varying feelings about the traffic lights, some would rather see a round about or a four way stop, anything but a traffic light. Others don't like the growth in their small town but recognize some form of traffic control is needed at the intersection. Still others are grateful something is being done at this intersection that can be very busy at certain times of the day and welcome the added safety, especially to pedestrians.
A small group of citizens wants to know why the mayor and city council did not inform the public when the light was being installed. According to Johnson the answer lies first in who owns the road, and second in established policy. The fact is Main Street is a state road under the jurisdiction of UDOT, and Center Street going south to Charleston is also a state road.
Johnson said, "That's their road, they never notify the public when they are about to pave Main Street, or when they are ready to stripe Center Street." It is not UDOT's policy to send out notifications to residents for road work projects.
As for the city, UDOT only informed Johnson the work would begin soon, no date was given. Johnson said he has given reports to the city council in their regular public city council meeting at least half a dozen times in the last several months, one of which resulted in an article in The Wasatch Wave and on this blog.
Over the years the majority of Midway residents responding to citizen survey's have indicated a strong preference for a round about as a safe and aesthetically pleasing alternative to a traffic light. Johnson said UDOT looked at putting in a round about on Center and Main.
Johnson said UDOT's
intent was to complete a traffic control project within their right of way.
UDOT said 'we don't have funds for roundabout'. Johnson gave several good
arguments for putting in a round about. First, they are an effective way to
control traffic flow by keeping vehicles moving. Second, in the event of
an accident a round about is safer for vehicles because accidents occur at an
angle and are more likely to hit bumpers, this is called deflected impact. In a
regular light controlled intersection accidents are more likely to occur at a
90 degree angle with one vehicle hitting the other on the side.
Drawbacks to a round
about, according to Johnson, include studies have shown they are not safer for
pedestrians. Johnson said, "Some people say a roundabout is more aesthetically
pleasing, but if four people have died there ... that's a high price to pay for
aesthetically pleasing. We place a high value on pedestrian safety,
especially with pedestrian traffic on Main Street during Swiss Days."
Another drawback is a
roundabout requires more land than a traffic light. Johnson said double stacked
trucks, or semi's pulling a second trailer behind the first, when going through
a roundabout need a lot of extra room. Trucks of this size do come through
Midway. If UDOT was willing to pay for property outside of their right of way
this would put a heavy impact on the properties surrounding the Center and Main
intersection.
Johnson said, "Some
people say that UDOT should just condemn the property and do the roundabout
anyway." Johnson said to do that UDOT would need to meet three criteria:
1. UDOT must show a public need for a roundabout, which they did when they
completed a traffic study showing the intersection warrants a traffic light. 2.
UDOT must have the money for a project up front to purchase the property and
pay the costs of the project, fund raising after deciding to build is not
allowed. UDOT does not have funds to purchase the property and wants to build
their project within their right of way. 3. UDOT must show there is no other
practical alternative, if someone took them to court for condemning property
for a roundabout a judge would throw the case out because a traffic light is a
practical alternative to a roundabout.
Johnson said,
"After learning this we quickly went away from the idea of a
roundabout."
There are two commercial properties and two residential properties located on the four corners of the intersection. Both residential properties are on the historic registry. Johnson said, "I personally have talked to the business owners multiple times regarding the project's impact to their property. On Monday the 7-11 people told him 'thank you, we are glad, we need something there' while The Midway Adventure Company owner said 'you should have told me it was happening today'.
All improvements at the
intersection are within UDOT's right of way, Johnson said. "UDOT was very
willing to take on additional cost to help greatly minimize impact on the two
residential properties on the corner. Rather than installing one pole at each
corner or four poles with one extending mast for the traffic lights as in a
traditional controlled intersection, UDOT is installing two poles with dual
masts. One pole will be on the northwest corner where 7-11 is with one mast
extending south toward Charleston, and the other mast extending east toward
Heber. The second pole will be on the southeast corner with one mast extending
north toward Wilson Peak and the other mast extending west toward the Wasatch
Mountains. A pedestrian button will be installed on all four corners resulting
in minimal impact to the two residential properties.
As of last Wednesday's
meeting Johnson said there is a possibility the signal poles will not be ready
in time for the two weeks before Swiss Days deadline. In that event, Johnson
told UDOT if they could not meet the deadline because the poles were not ready,
to do all the preliminary work. "There’s some curb widening, asphalt
installation, conduit, I’m fine with that, do all the underground, get the
pedestals ready, get everything ready, and take all of the traffic control off
the site. Then, after Swiss Days I’m fine if you physically come and set the
pole and get the lights going."
Johnson said there is a
good chance the project will be completed in time, but if it's not completed
the point he wanted to make is no work on the project should be done in the two
week time frame before Swiss Days.
UPDATE ON RIVER ROAD AND MAIN STREET TRAFFIC LIGHT
River Road (400 East)
and Main Street also warrants a traffic light. Johnson said when UDOT first
informed the city it was conducting a traffic study on the Center Street and
Main Street intersection, he said 'You ought to also do a traffic study on 400
East and Main Street, in my personal opinion that's more busy'.
Originally UDOT intended
to install the second light this summer. However, this spring Johnson told UDOT
he was concerned with the road going from three lanes wide, narrowing down to
two lanes wide, then going back to three lanes wide, only to narrow down to two
lanes again all in a one block space, from about 350 East to 450 East on Main
Street.
UDOT set aside $70,000
for the River Road and Main Street project, but with the additional costs
associated with widening the road, UDOT estimates the project at $1 million.
They have been trying to raise another $30,000 in order to do the project this summer.
Johnson told the council
at last Wednesday's meeting, "Because of right of way, it won’t happen
this year, it will be next summer."
Karl Dodge, city
councilman, asked, "Have they got the funding for that yet?
Colleen Bonner, mayor,
said, "They're working on it."
Johnson said, "No,
that's the problem, is the funding."
UDOT has scheduled the
project for next summer. Since they could not raise the funds this year, they
can get the additional funds from their 2018 budget. Johnson said when they go
out into the field to design the project they may find things that need to be
done so that the as the final design comes in the costs could go up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please follow the same guidelines from our facebook group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/midwayutah/
THIS BLOG IS FOR INFORMATIVE PURPOSES. Political commentary with the intent to inform is welcome. Positive sharing of community events is highly encouraged. Please keep comments positive. Please remember the art of civility in your communication. Agree to disagree if necessary to keep group exchanges respectful. No name calling, arguing, or trolling allowed.